Public bug reported:

Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/1138308:

Package: libesmtp
Version: 1.1.0-3.2
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
control: affects -1 src:openssl
User: [email protected]
Usertags: openssl-4.0

OpenSSL 4.0 is in experimental. This package fails to build against it:

| [17/34] cc -Ilibesmtp.so.6.2.0.p -I. -I.. -fdiagnostics-color=always 
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -std=c11 -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200809L 
-D_DEFAULT_SOURCE -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration 
-ffile-prefix-map=/build/reproducible-path/libesmtp-1.1.0=. 
-fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat 
-Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC 
-pthread -MD -MQ libesmtp.so.6.2.0.p/smtp-tls.c.o -MF 
libesmtp.so.6.2.0.p/smtp-tls.c.o.d -o libesmtp.so.6.2.0.p/smtp-tls.c.o -c 
../smtp-tls.c
| FAILED: [code=1] libesmtp.so.6.2.0.p/smtp-tls.c.o 
| cc -Ilibesmtp.so.6.2.0.p -I. -I.. -fdiagnostics-color=always 
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -std=c11 -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200809L 
-D_DEFAULT_SOURCE -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration 
-ffile-prefix-map=/build/reproducible-path/libesmtp-1.1.0=. 
-fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat 
-Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC 
-pthread -MD -MQ libesmtp.so.6.2.0.p/smtp-tls.c.o -MF 
libesmtp.so.6.2.0.p/smtp-tls.c.o.d -o libesmtp.so.6.2.0.p/smtp-tls.c.o -c 
../smtp-tls.c
| ../smtp-tls.c: In function ‘check_acceptable_security’:
| ../smtp-tls.c:573:66: error: invalid use of incomplete typedef 
‘ASN1_IA5STRING’ {aka ‘struct asn1_string_st’}
|   573 |                   const char *ia5str = (const char *) 
name->d.ia5->data;
|       |                                                                  ^~
| ../smtp-tls.c:574:46: error: invalid use of incomplete typedef 
‘ASN1_IA5STRING’ {aka ‘struct asn1_string_st’}
|   574 |                   size_t ia5len = name->d.ia5->length;
|       |                                              ^~
| ../smtp-tls.c:589:29: warning: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier 
from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
|   589 |           X509_NAME *subj = X509_get_subject_name (cert);
|       |                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| ../smtp-tls.c:604:26: warning: assignment discards ‘const’ qualifier from 
pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
|   604 |                   && (cn = X509_NAME_ENTRY_get_data (
|       |                          ^
| ../smtp-tls.c: In function ‘rsp_starttls’:
| ../smtp-tls.c:686:15: warning: ‘X509_NAME_get_text_by_NID’ is deprecated: 
Since OpenSSL 4.0 [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
|   686 |               X509_NAME_get_text_by_NID (X509_get_subject_name (cert),
|       |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| In file included from /usr/include/openssl/x509v3.h:27,
|                  from ../smtp-tls.c:55:
| /usr/include/openssl/x509.h:1041:27: note: declared here
|  1041 | OSSL_DEPRECATEDIN_4_0 int X509_NAME_get_text_by_NID(const X509_NAME 
*name,
|       |                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.


Full buildlog
        
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-rebuild/logs-4/attempted/libesmtp_1.1.0-3.2_amd64-2026-04-19T07:37:55Z

Sebastian

** Affects: libesmtp (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Affects: libesmtp (Debian)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New


** Tags: ftbfs openssl-4.0

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1138308
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1138308

** Changed in: libesmtp (Debian)
 Remote watch: None => Debian Bug tracker #1138308

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2154855

Title:
  libesmtp: FTBFS with openssl 4.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libesmtp/+bug/2154855/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to