Hi Mitchell, thank you for this well prepared request. Given that this request is for a new version of what already is in main this is even more than we'd strictly need. Given [1] this would not even need a re-review as [2] isn't too old.
I actually get the feeling that [2] is clear for re-reviews but the implication that we expect less for such source renames or new versions from the requester is not. I'd suggest you work with your Mentor and if you are unsure clarify with me, a proposal to change probably [3] to be more clear. So far it seems some know and do the easy path and others are not. So maybe clarifying this among us could help everyone else as well? A lot of the now good reports like testing present is an outcome of the last MIR and great to see to still be in place. I highly appreciate that you had the section that matters almost most here and is sadly often forgotten, that about your plan to migrate reverse dependencies to lua5.5 - looking fine as well. This would be an approval at this stage already, but let me return the favor and also do a full check (allows me to check some tooling I work on and better ensures we are not missing something). [1]: https://ubuntu.com/project/docs/MIR/mir-rereview/#renamed-or-reorganized-sources [2]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lua5.4/+bug/2026608 [3]: https://ubuntu.com/project/docs/MIR/mir-roles-and-steps/#reporter-thinks-about-the-package -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2155757 Title: [MIR] lua5.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lua5.5/+bug/2155757/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
