Thanks; makes sense and Recommends in universe are not blockers
Note that you should also include a `-b` reverse-depends check (Build-
Depends) when asking for removals, it is ok in for this one
$ reverse-depends -r stonking -b src:sblim-sfcb
No reverse dependencies found
and removed now
$ ./remove-package -s stonking -m "Ubuntu specific, unmaintained, fails to
build (lp: #2166970)" sblim-sfcb
Removing packages from stonking:
sblim-sfcb 1.4.9-0ubuntu10 in stonking
sfcb 1.4.9-0ubuntu10 in stonking amd64
sfcb 1.4.9-0ubuntu10 in stonking amd64v3
sfcb 1.4.9-0ubuntu10 in stonking arm64
sfcb 1.4.9-0ubuntu10 in stonking armhf
sfcb 1.4.9-0ubuntu10 in stonking ppc64el
sfcb 1.4.9-0ubuntu10 in stonking riscv64
sfcb 1.4.9-0ubuntu10 in stonking s390x
sfcb-test 1.4.9-0ubuntu10 in stonking amd64
sfcb-test 1.4.9-0ubuntu10 in stonking amd64v3
sfcb-test 1.4.9-0ubuntu10 in stonking arm64
sfcb-test 1.4.9-0ubuntu10 in stonking armhf
sfcb-test 1.4.9-0ubuntu10 in stonking i386
sfcb-test 1.4.9-0ubuntu10 in stonking ppc64el
sfcb-test 1.4.9-0ubuntu10 in stonking riscv64
sfcb-test 1.4.9-0ubuntu10 in stonking s390x
Comment: Ubuntu specific, unmaintained, fails to build (lp: #2166970)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.
$ ./remove-package -s stonking-proposed -m "Ubuntu specific, unmaintained,
fails to build (lp: #2166970)" sblim-sfcb
Removing packages from stonking-proposed:
sblim-sfcb 1.4.9-0ubuntu11 in stonking
Comment: Ubuntu specific, unmaintained, fails to build (lp: #2166970)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.
** Changed in: sblim-sfcb (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2166970
Title:
FTBFS: sblim-sfcb fails to build in the stonking archive
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sblim-sfcb/+bug/2166970/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
