It is incorrect report from lintian. This package is NOT under GPL but under "GPL v2 with the Classpath exception". It is actually GPL v2 with appended text but we did not know if we can reference GPL v2 as usual and leave appended text or if we should leave it as it is. For now we left original license text in copyright file. It is dual license CDDL + GPL v2 with the Classpath exception. We would like to get law expertise if we can replace GPL v2 by reference to /usr/share/common-licenses in our case.
-- copyright file should refer to /usr/share/common-licenses https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193099 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
