options 2 & 3 are the maximum efford, and I don't think someone can come up with such packages in a timely fashion. Furthermore, option 2 can be implemented outside the archive, like in the gnucash PPA.
I don't quite understand the difference between 1 & 4, but both of them require downgrading existing packages in hardy. I am proposing the opposite: Update them to the version currently in unstable! Regarding the possibilty of compiling gnucash-hbci: - Since debian has already updated, I expect howtos and documentation how to do that anyway will appear soon - you can still compile and install libaqbaking2 yourself in /usr/local or in your home - hardy will be a LTS. Backports of gnucash when ready will be possible as soon as the porting has been done. Still waiting for input of motu-release. -- Package dependencies broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209181 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
