On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 02:45 +0000, Brian Kemp wrote: > We know it's not the preferred form for editing the work. It's too bad > that the copyright holder seems to think so. >
if its not the prefered form its not free - especially since we are told there *is* source code that we are not being given access too. kk > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:28 PM, KarlGoetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 14:18 +0000, Tim Gardner wrote: > > > I agree with David Miller: http://lkml.org/lkml/2000/2/23/219 > > > > Not sure what your agreeing with - > > That sourceless microcode is ok if its GPL? > > > > > > > > ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) > > > Status: Triaged => Invalid > > > > > ** Attachment added: "unnamed" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13196675/unnamed -- 2.6.24 contains non-free fore200e files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
