On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 3:45 AM, Nicola Jelmorini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For me the work around of @bullium don't function as the others work > arounds described here. > I think that Glipper still has a problem. > It's not normal that for some users it's ok with a work around, fore some > others with another work around, and for some others Glipper don't function > at all. > Yes, it's not a *solution*, and I frankly don't understand why people keep posting comments about the workaround. Even if it works, the bug is still valid, and shouldn't ever get to the point that it can't understand its own history file. If someone else wants to make overtures upstream or fix it themselves, that'd be great, but I don't know that continuing to comment and to discuss the workaround on this bug is getting us anywhere. ** Attachment added: "unnamed" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14626117/unnamed -- glipper crashed with ValueError in load() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175490 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
