I see no reason this shouldn't meet the SRU requirements. Particularly, this one: - Bugs which represent severe regressions from the previous release of Ubuntu. This includes packages which are totally unusuable, like being uninstallable or crashing on startup.
A program which doesn't start at all without manual intervention is a pretty severe regression, IMO. Not to mention that Hardy is an LTS release. -- fail2ban fails to start after reboot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222804 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
