> Normally the symlinks are not removed on upgrades, to keep files
> available during upgrades. We need a way to remove these on upgrade
> to package not using pycentral in the future. This lets the preinst of a new 
> version
> of a package drop a file, so that the symlinks are removed on upgrade in any
> case.

Do I understand correctly that no packages will be uploaded to hardy
that make use of this new functionality - it's only being added to
ensure that packages in intrepid or later, which previously used python-
central but no longer do, can rely on this functionality being present
without having to have a versioned dependency on python-central? I'm ok
with such an infrastructure change in SRU, as long as it's /only/ an
infrastructure change and doesn't change any existing behavior.

Fix for Debian bug #409390 - self-explanatory, no objections to
including a fix in SRU.  (Wasn't there also a bug in LP about this same
issue?)

Bug #225927 - ok, I wondered if this were a dpkg consistency question,
but didn't realize this had been confirmed.  Your proposed fix is
definitely reasonable there.

>  * pycentral updatedefault: Call py_compilefiles with `-f' for private
>    modules.
> -> we can't rely on the timestamp, if we change the default python version

Is there a bug reference for this?  I don't have enough context here to
understand what this is about.  What timestamp was being relied on?

> * dh_pycentral: Install the preinst script for packages having
>    private modules; really closes: #477180.
> -> needed for updates with new or non-existing files in the new version.

Which change in the source does this correspond to?  I don't see any
changes in the diff that look like they fit this description.

The other changes don't look to me like they warrant inclusion in an SRU
(one is a change to a build-time tool, and there's no mention here of
packages that need to be rebuilt once these fixes are available; the
other is a fix for /usr/bin/python not being a symlink, which it always
is when using distribution packages), but I won't reject the SRU on
those grounds either.  But please answer the question in the preceding
paragraph.

-- 
SRU for hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237654
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to