There was a bug in the minimal example, since there was a missing b++.
It seems that I hit an example where the behavior is left unspecified
and C++ is free to produce whatever code it wants. This is bad, but not
a security issue by itself.
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security issue
** Changed in: gcc-4.3 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
std::sort algorithm reads past end of vector
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245236
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
