Geoff, thanks for the follow-up! Seems that we should get 2.2.0-final into Intrepid (we have beta5 at the moment). Jonathan, any chance you could test the 2.2.0-1 from Debian experimental? If it works, we should sync it over.
I do consider it security sensitive in a way that such file formats are often taken from unknown third-party sources. Thus this provides the classical vector of putting a crafted .cml (or other format) somewhere and luring people to open it, which would then run arbitrary code on their systems. Of course our current measures of SSP, ASLR, and FORTIFY_SOURCE make this hard to do, but a general source code review still can't hurt. Thanks, Martin -- main inclusion review for openbabel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236051 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
