can anybody confirm the fix has been implemented in Hardy backports? I filed a separate bug report, and then you marked it as a duplicate of this one. So which statement of yours should I follow - file a separate bug report, or just keep quite and pretend there isn't a problem?
Sorry, but I get irked when people say, "you're doing something wrong." I installed everything even slightly related to pidgin from apt-get (with every hardy repos, even backports, enabled). I have not checked in the past week as to if a newer version has been released, and will do so when I get home this evening, but as of 2008-07-10 the backports version - though a higher version than the "normal" version - would not connect to icq... there's nothing I can screw up in that chain, either the fix upgrading the icq-version-string that gets sent is updated, or it isn't. -- Cannot connect to ICQ ("The client version you are using is too old.") https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244591 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs