lusiads wrote: > The rest of work should be supported by scim, such as changing IM > options. Most people prefer traditional tone-marking style, some > others prefer new style. Both are very similar (only requires a > little change to code of m17n database). Should we provide each > options with seperated (IM) database? > > scim should allow each IM has its independent options. For example > selecting either style in vi-*. >
I'm afraid you are out of luck here. SCIM only has a bridge to m17n, means it cannot handle arbitrary options per m17n IM module. One way would be to copy add additional IMs to m17n-contrib (m17n-contrib are user contributed modules, while m17n-db are the ones provided by upstream m17n). So, what you could do: copy the vi-* modules from m17n-db to m17n-contrib, rename them and add the freestyle functions. Then submit the changes as a patch, both to upstream and also to this bug report. Otherwise, you would need to create a separate native scim plugin to handle this issue. Cheers Arne -- Freestyle input does not work in vi-* https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
