** Summary changed: - [gnome] normal volume control useless, various race conditions + gstreamer alsa mixer renders gnome volume controls useless
** Description changed: - Primary example (only GNOME affected) + Primary example (only GNOME affected, focus of this bug, prelim. patch for it below) 1. Open gnome-volume-control 2. option a. Use keyboard to control volume. It is immediately messed up and the progress bar on the volume control disappears. You can see with alsamixer that one channel is randomly muted now and then. 2. option b. Rapidly adjust PCM volume with the channels locked. The channels will eventually loosen up or one will go to 0. GNOME without pulseaudio and without software mixing still has the problem. The problem seems DIRECTLY related to GNOME, but it's also possible this bug is similar to the one below. The first problem is MUCH worse and ruins daily, practical use of the OS. The second is an observation and not intended to be the focal point of this bug report. I didn't see random muting with the second bug (that I can remember) but I saw a ton with the first. -------------------------- Secondary example (all desktops): 1. Open gnome-alsamixer 2. Open gnome-volume-control 3. Open alsamixer Adjust PCM volume with text-mode alsamixer. The two channels get out of sync very quickly. sudo sh -c "echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online" This command actually fixes the GNOME volume control on one of my dual- core systems (Intrepid/emu10k1). It is consistently reproducible and directly related to that command. On the other system (Hardy custom 2.6.26/cmipci), the command seems to have no effect and the problem remains. Something is wrong with the locking or mutexing of the volume controls in an underlying component of Ubuntu. For some people, that means even rudimentary volume control with the keyboard is problematic. Affected drivers: - cmipci - emu10k1 - possibly every audio driver The second example happens on systems even with the 2nd cpu disabled, just a little less. With the first example it doesn't seem to matter. Intrepid as of 7/24/2008 is affected. I was not able to demonstrate any inconsistencies with the text-mode alsamixer when GNOME or KDE was not open, but that does not mean the race is not somewhere in the kernel either. Moving the volume controls with keys is a lot less stressful on the drivers than using a smooth slider or running apps that monitor the volume in real-time. I have tried every fix I have seen, and none have fixed the problem. Possibly related bugs: - Bug 126333 From my debugging, a zero is first being written to a volume channel for some reason. I am not sure why or the source of it. Mixers then read this zero and the mistake carries on from there. I will attach some library call logs from my debugging, but I can not say that they are reliable. "workinglogs" is from adjusting it slowly up and then slowly down in the text-mode alsamixer program with no desktop environment loaded, only a TTY. "brokenlogs" shows what happens when I use my keyboard to do the same thing. The volume is jumping down periodically or going to zero. _snd_mixer_selem_set_volume s->str[0].vol[1] = 18 elem_write_volume s->str[0].vol[0] = 0 elem_write_volume s->str[0].vol[1] = 18 The second write command giving alsa a zero makes no sense, and completely destroys the linearity of the adjustment. But I don't know where it's coming from. I don't know if it's adjusting the same track number even or if it is the cause of the problem, but it seems to correlate. Each log file (mylogn) in the archives is tracking a different part of the sound control subsystem. mylog5 is the lowest level and mylog1/mylog2(gstreamer) are the highest. text-mode didn't use mylog1/mylog2, only 3-5 which are farther down the line in the sound system. Both machines were dual-core Intel Core 2 running x86_64 architecture Ubuntu with 4GB of RAM. All tracing was done on the first system (cmipci). -- gstreamer alsa mixer renders gnome volume controls useless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252237 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs