Greetings! I would like to add that OpenShot also puts a huge focus on "the right way". It's not really fair to say that because OpenShot has more features and more effects, it's automatically not focusing on the fundamentals. OpenShot has a lot of dedicated developers and contributors, and we work so hard to make a great product. =)
Thanks! -Jonathan On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:15 PM, sarvōdaya <danny.picciri...@ubuntu.com>wrote: > Oops, replying from my subscribed email address this time. > > Yeah, OpenShot seems to be getting a lot of attention, but PiTiVi is doing > a much better job IMHO. Instead of trying to put out features first, they're > making sure they get the fundamentals right. In fact, I think I first > learned this from Jono: http://gnomejournal.org/article/79/pitivi > > 'Part of the reason PiTiVi has taken so long to mature is that Edward has > been conscious to build PiTiVi “the right way” and ensure that the > underlying infrastructure that PiTiVi is built upon is mature and stable.' > > I'm personally really excited about the next release of PiTiVi. It'll have > effects and transitions and all too: > http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/09/pitivi-video-effects-ubuntu-download/ > > In addition, PiTiVi's work will benefit other video editors that want to > use Gstreamer, that powerful framework that powers all of Ubuntu's > multimedia. > > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 23:37, Shane Fagan > <shanepatrickfa...@ubuntu.com>wrote: > >> Hey Jono, >> >> I think someone mentioned it before but at the time it looked really bad >> and its a lot bigger than pitivi if I remember correctly since pitivi >> only needs a few libs on top of what we already have so on the disk its >> tiny. I suppose we could switch to openshot but since space is starting >> to dry up fast and we are trying to keep things small so we can fit Qt >> on the disk I dont know. >> >> --fagan >> >> On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 17:26 -0800, Jono Bacon wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > Recently I have been using OpenShot with some good success. While there >> > are some crasher issues, it seems the app demonstrates a great feature >> > set and good meet the needs of our users well. It currently has 4/5 in >> > the Ubuntu Software Center. >> > >> > I wanted to check in and see if there has been any assessment of whether >> > OpenShot would be a better choice than PiTiVi for the CD? I suspect the >> > dependency chain is greater, which may cause disk space issues, but I >> > wasn't sure if anyone has had this discussion (maybe at a UDS?) before? >> > >> > Jono >> > >> > -- >> > Jono Bacon >> > Ubuntu Community Manager >> > jono(at)ubuntu(dot)com >> > www.ubuntu.com : www.jonobacon.org >> > www.twitter.com/jonobacon : www.identi.ca/jonobacon >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> ubuntu-desktop mailing list >> ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop >> > > > > -- > .sarvōdaya > > [𝄽#] The Silent Number > http://thesilentnumber.me/ > ☮♥Ⓐ > > -- > ubuntu-desktop mailing list > ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop > >
-- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
