On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 6:33 PM Jean-Baptiste Lallement < jean-baptiste.lallem...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Hi Robert, > > Le 08/08/2017 à 06:02, Robert Ancell a écrit : > > Hi all, > > > > One thing that came out of discussions at GUADEC was a request that > > Ubuntu ship the core GNOME apps. We've also had a few discussions > > recently on this list about including some of these. > > > > I proposed that we should make a list of the reasons that we ship / do > > not ship certain apps so it would be clear to everyone why this is the > > case (and perhaps indicate any features that would make us change our > > minds). Here it is: > > > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DefaultApps > Thanks for making this list. In the criteria you mention "They are good > quality apps" I think this criteria should be more detailed and the > upstream QA process documented and linked. I propose to add the > following information: > - There is a reliable test suite executed at least for every release. > - Description of the coverage of the test suite(s) (unit, functional, > API, ...) > - The tests are executed at build time on all the arch we support and > if not a rationale is provided to explain why some arch are excluded. > - autopkgtest are enabled and executed on Ubuntu releases against the > actual binary packages. > - The test plan is documented. > I reverse-engineered the existing criteria but I agree we should be be more stringent for new apps (as well as applying this over time to the existing apps). No opposition from me for you adding this. --Robert
-- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
