Scott Kitterman wrote: > ReiserFS is effectively unmaintained. I've switched from ReiserFS to Ext3 > for > my installs too. While it works well now, bitrot seems inevitable. > > Scott K > > Note: This has nothing to do with an legal issues the developers have. The > Reiser devs have been focused on ResierFS4 for quite some time.
The point though, is still valid; reiserfs doesn't bother forcing a disk check every n mounts, so why does ext3 still do this? I think these days the kernel is bug free enough and hardware is generally reliable enough that we can drop the forced fsck by default. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
