Stefano, Agreed. I only used the one from kernel.org because I wanted to try out a newer kernel. I did not, however, have to do any patching to use the workaround. I don't see why it wouldn't work with a stock Ubuntu kernel.
--Dane On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 11:15 +0100, Stefano Doni wrote: > Thanks Dave for your willingness, > but I think it is definitely better to fix this into Ubuntu stock > kernel, so that other user will benefit from it! > > > 2008/10/28 Dane Mutters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Stefano, > > I'm currently using this workaround with kernel 2.6.26.5, > downloaded > from www.kernel.org, and compiled/installed using "The > Old-Fashioned > Debian > Way" ( https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Kernel/Compile ). > Attached is my most recent config file (compressed). > > --Dane > > > On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 10:35 +0100, Stefano Doni wrote: > > Thanks Dane, > > is this workaround valid with stock kernels? > > > > Can other developers comment on this? > > > > I would not consider compiling my own kernel to be a > solution for me, > > I firmly believe it is better to use the stock Ubuntu one. > > > > Thanks! > > > > 2008/10/28 Dane Mutters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I don't remember if I mentioned it on this list, but > I > > submitted a bug > > (pertaining to Hardy) that at least SEEMS very > similar to this > > a while > > ago. It has yet to be looked at. > > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/220349 > > > > I managed to find a workaround by way of recompiling > the > > kernel and > > blacklisting a module. Perhaps somebody will find > this > > useful. > > > > --Dane > > > > > > -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
