On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 09:53:06AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > Thus I think we should not (only) base the font size on dpi, but > rather on the physical size of the screen. Does anyone know whether > the reported (EDID) physical size of the monitor is reliable on may
(I assume you meant "many") > devices? Since the X server uses EDID-reported physical size to determine the DPI, it's at least as precise as basing the font size on DPI alone, no? Marius Gedminas -- Everyone has a photographic memory. Some don't have film.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
