On Monday 16 March 2009 2:13:34 am Null Ack wrote: > Gday folks :) > > There is difference between what I foresee as sensible security > defaults for our desktop build against what is being currently > delivered. It may very well be that there is aspects to the current > setup that I am not fully aware of, and I'd like to better understand > the reasoning behind the current situation if so. Otherwise, perhaps I > could please suggest some possible enhancements: > > * Enabling UFW by default or some other firewall by default > * Having AppArmor actually protecting the desktop build rather than > what seems as currently a false illusion of coverage with just CUPS > being protected
NoScript addon installed by default would probably fall into the "security that's too disruptive" category, I'm guessing? Oh, and um...ufw enabled *for IPv6* as well. -- Mackenzie Morgan http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com apt-get moo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
