ke, 2009-06-10 kello 15:21 -0400, John Moser kirjoitti: > Every argument for putting Grub or the kernel on a separate partition > has been based around the idea that these files are somehow more > important than, say, /bin/sh
Putting the kernel (i.e., /boot) on a separate partition is often mandated by the BIOS not being able to read all of a large hard disk. I have a motherboard from 2008 that has that problem, so it's not ancient history, either. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
