> > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:44:07 +0100, Michael Vogt wrote: > > First and foremost I'm sorry that you had such a bad upgrade > > experience. We work hard to make it smooth and painless and take the > > bugs/issues very seriously. > Thanks. Sorry if I seemed a little disappointed -- I was. This is the first > time that I've encountered a real show-stopper during upgrade. >
> > If you still have access to the logs, could you please report a bug or > > mail me the content of /var/log/dist-upgrade/* ? I would really like > > to know what happend there. Given that your sources.list got udated > > (see below) I'm pretty sure there is useful log information available. > I'll check tonight -- the machine is at home > > > > So you stopped it and killed the session (that update-manager was > > running in) yourself? It was not the upgrade process that kicked you > > out? I assume you answered "no, please stop the upgrade" at the > > debconf prompt? I see that you reported bug #471436, I assume the > > pre-isnt exit there (comment #2) is the result of clicking cancel). > Pretty-much, yeah, if memory serves. > > > Thanks, indi and wicd have no open bugs about this it seems, could you > > please report them and include the failure? > > Sorry: 1) the indi issue happened at a VT, so no automagic reporting ): 2) the wicd issue was a proverbial camel's-back breaker. I was just getting hellin with all the reports that I was filing. I'll give it a bash tonight. > > Please also file a bug about the grub problem, with the apt terminal > > log included. I suspect that grub somehow got removed during the > > upgrade but the logs should give us more details. > Sorry, I don't have the terminal logs available -- it was in VT. But I do remember seeing it go past, and it had "appeared" to install OK. Also, dpkg -S /boot/grub/stage1 (iirc) reported the source grub package (perhaps grub-common? I'm not on the machine now, so this is from memory...). The package, for all intents and purposes, appeared to be installed. I don't mind logging a bug against this, but I'm quite sure that with the lack of useful information, the log will just waste a dev's time ): > -d > -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- There is no shame in not knowing; the shame is in not finding out.
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
