Oli Warner wrote: > Just one point to make here > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Paul Smith <p...@mad-scientist.us > <mailto:p...@mad-scientist.us>> wrote: > > I used to [compile my own kernel] all the time but it's been years > since I needed > some new feature enough to spend the effort of compiling my own > kernel, > rather than just using what came with my distro and waiting a few > months > for the next distro release. > > > Normally I'd completely agree but there are two high-end consumer > features missing (AFAIK) from .32: > > - ATA TRIM to stop SSDs grinding to a halt > - Intel i7 turbo boost optimisations I think you missed at least one. There is not RT patch for the *.32 kernel. So problems for the ubuntu studio team to deliver an good Realtime kernel, needed for music production. That's bad new for all the musicians and producers who are using Jack, Ardour etc. > > These are pretty important features to be missing from a LTS but I do > agree that it also needs a stable kernel in the LTS. What I don't > quite understand is why .33 can't be in and there be point releases to > improve stability over time. It's done for security. > > Bah. We're way too far along for any of this discussion to have any > effect on the final version. ~D
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
