Reply bottom-posted. >From: Chris Jones <chrisjo...@comcen.com.au> >To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com >Sent: Wed, April 28, 2010 8:20:16 PM >Subject: Re: 10.04rc: missing tree command > >> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:20:45 +0100 >> From: Chris Coulson <chrisccoul...@ubuntu.com> >> Subject: Re: 10.04rc: missing tree command > > >> On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 10:45 +0200, J?r?me Bouat wrote: >>> Hello, >> >> I think the useful "tree" tiny command should be installed by default >> (no dependency, 98kB). >> >> Regards. >> > >> Well, overlooking the fact that we are in final freeze, a few days from >>> release and tree isn't even in main - why? > >> Regards >> Chris > >**************************************** > >I couldn't agree more. I have mentioned this before on the mailing list. If >you go back through the archives you'll probably find it somewhere. But when I >mentioned it, I didn't seem to get much support from anyone else. And the same >thing appears to have happened this time around. > >I would have thought that it was a tool/command that is used by many people. >It's an essential command in my line of work (albeit on Windows) and couldn't >imagine file management without it. I guess we're part of a rare few that seem >to find this command very useful. > > >-- >Chris Jones >Photographic Imaging Professional and Graphic Designer >ABN: 98 317 740 240
I too find this command very useful and always pull it in soon after I install a new Linux instance. -- Bruce Miller, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada br...@brmiller.ca; (613) 745-1151 Just when you think your software is idiot proof, somebody comes up with a better idiot Keyboard not found...Press any key to continue. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
