Excerpts from Colin Watson's message of Thu Nov 18 18:39:33 -0500 2010: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:34:58PM -0600, Robbie Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 16:22 +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:08:47AM -0600, Robbie Williamson wrote: > > > > What if the Server team maintained the 2nd stage? Then we'd be making > > > > life easier for you, right? ;) > > > > > > Er. :-) > > > > > > (In seriousness, any good-quality second stage would require some level > > > of cooperation from the first stage. We tried that and it was awful.) > > > > So I see the 1st stage as just installing the minimal server, then we > > boot to a login prompt...user logs in and can either do his/her business > > as desired or launch the 2nd stage (which they are told about in a 1st > > boot motd-type message). > > The problem is that doing task selection in the second stage, for a CD > installer, requires keeping copies of a bunch of packages because it's > quite plausible that the user ejected the CD. The code necessary for > this was horrific, and I think the problems with it are fundamental. >
Good point. I'd suggest to keep on the -server iso only the packages that are required to create a minimal/lean install. The assumption is that upon reboot the system will have access to an archive via the network (which is different from having access to the Internet). > It's really much better to do the whole installation in one go, IMO. Agreed. And there is only one choice for the whole installation: a minimal/lean install (as the tasksel screen would be removed from the installer - or replaced with a message suggesting that system can be configured for certain roles (with a list of examples) once it has rebooted). -- Mathias Gug Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss