On 04/09/2013 12:57 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
It was never meant as a successor.
My mistake.
"endorsed by the community" - not true. I'm a Debian Developer and Ubuntu Core Dev and I don't endorse either aptitude nor apt-get.
Well, I'm going by the goddamn page that's been there for years - forgive me if Debian fucked up their wiki. It clearly says that aptitude is the recommended program.
What do you mean by "stable"? It didn't support multi-arch well for a long time, which is a flagship feature for Ubuntu for many releases now.
many releases meaning two? It's only been here since 12.04.
If anything, it's aptitude which is less feature-rich =) Space on the CD is still a reason for not including duplicate functionality.
What CD?
You still did not address how to fix the reverse dependencies which rely on apt-get.
Because I bowed my head. I understand. I understand. It's not a good idea. It won't work. It won't work. It's not a good idea. I understand. Thank you. Thank you. Get on with your daily lives.
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
