On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Rodney Dawes <rodney.da...@canonical.com> wrote: > It's not an excuse. It's a fact. More importantly, the Ubuntu release > name is no > longer "warty" either, so that alone should give you some insight on why > it is > still named the way it is. How about simply making it actually be a .png > instead > of a JPEG (so that it will be a higher quality image, as JPEG > compression tends > to result in artifacts, particularly when scaling).
Anything you mentioned is worth doing, I'm looking forward to my Saucy break one day because the wallpaper package. > Furthermore, as already stated, this is a bug in eog (or perhaps > gdk-pixbuf), if it > can't open an image file where the extension doesn't match the content. > While it > would be nice to rename the file in question, it would be nicer to fix > eog to not > fail in such situations. This shouldn't be a news either but I understand that eog's problem should belongs to GNOME upstream. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss