On Apr 9, 2015 8:20 AM, "Daniel J Blueman" <dan...@quora.org> wrote: > > On 9 April 2015 at 20:14, Istimsak Abdulbasir <saqman2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Apr 9, 2015 8:09 AM, "Daniel J Blueman" <dan...@quora.org> wrote: > >> > >> Checked with Vivid beta on Intel i5 hardware, and it seems interrupt > >> distribution doesn't change when I boot with irqbalance running [1], > >> or after purging it and rebooting [2]. > >> > >> Finally, it can't second guess MSI interrupt setup better than the > >> APIC driver and adds a unnecessary layer of 'intelligence'. I don't > >> see any case common enough to warrant deploying it by default. > > > What is the irqbalance and what was the reason for using it? > > Please bottom-post only. > > irqbalance was of use when the kernel didn't optimally program > interrupt distribution for various devices (SATA, sound, GPU etc), > which wasn't the case for some years.
Does this mean there wasn't a separate IRQ for these devices?
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
