On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 08:33:49PM +0000, Adam Conrad wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 01:12:47PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Errrr, no. Anything that's in main is LTS-supported. As of 16.04, this > > should be 100% guaranteed; if it's not supported it wouldn't be in main. > So, the code in launchpad has never reflected this position. It has > always marked main-but-non-server/desktop-seeded as the non-LTS support > length. Given we *just* released xenial, it's *possible* we could > very carefully regenerate the release pocket to reflect a better view > of reality, if there's an agreement on what reality is, but this is > not a regression from how we generated that field in the past. Understood that it's not a regression. I think the current implementation follows logically from the time when we had multiple products in main, via the same seed pod (ubuntu), with different support lengths. But it's surely an oversight that packages seeded in a seed called "supported-foo" are shown as not supported by ubuntu-support-status! A completely correct implementation would have to take into consideration which product each package is "supported" as part of. But for 16.04, since we don't have any products in main with differing support periods, I think it should suffice to slam everything to 5y. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
