On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, thgntlmnfrmtrlfmdr wrote:
> The thing is I don't see why [a custodian] would need or want the
> right to relicense things [...]
Classic example of a relicence from GPL to MIT/X11 was Mesa3D to
enable tight integration with the X.org codebase. This means we all
now have OpenGL bling-bling on our desktops.
> but it does make it not copyleft
If one gets some code under the GPL, it continues to be under the GPL.
(An upstream's CLA or lack of CLA has nothing to do with that.)
-Paul
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
