On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > Imho it should be removed from the archive, and not be made available at all.
As long as we are shipping it though, isn't it reasonable to allow volunteers to keep it up to date? Same for stable releases where it did ship - our hardware enablement SRU policy applies to it, surely? I don't think it is appropriate to retroactively pull support for something that we already shipped. I also don't agree with marking the bug Won't Fix. If the package is to be removed, then we should get it removed, but until then, and for previous stable releases still in support, bugs against them are valid. Trusty and ESM would be a separate matter. My understanding is that regular SRUs stop when ESM begins, which if accurate would mean no change against user expectations from when those releases first shipped.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
