On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 08:42:48AM +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > (If this is an already known problem, where should I have checked before > reporting it? If it should be a bug report, against what?) > > Several packages say they failed to build, but do not have the build log > that would normally accompany this. > > Of the ones I uploaded recently (pandas, snakemake, statsmodels, theano): > pandas/arm64, armhf, ppc64el (with roughly the normal build duration) > statsmodels/armhf, ppc64el, s390x (s390x with an unusually long build > duration) > theano/ppc64el, s390x (with short build durations) > The same packages built successfully on Debian, but theano appears to be > BD-Uninstallable on Ubuntu. > > From the excuses "missing build" list: > dochelp/ppc64el > h5py/ppc64el > mate-applets/s390x > ghc/armhf > These are all less than 24 hours old (the builds, the ghc package is older); > I didn't find any older ones but I didn't check every entry.
This was a Launchpad infrastructure issue; exact cause not completely clear but it looks like it was a networking problem in one of our datacentres. I've retried the affected builds now. -- Colin Watson (he/him) [[email protected]] -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
