I was on Patch Pilot duty today, and found it to be a nice way to spend most of the day. I applaud those responsible for organizing this effort and allocating time for us to work on it.
Here are my results: LP: #497886 - merge needed a little cleanup, had to repack the orig tarball, fixed a minor/easy lintian warning about copyright encoding, uploaded to natty LP: #576949 - sponsored/uploaded to lucid-proposed for SRU, straightforward, easy enough LP: #627272, #575019, #534629, #572271, #574443, #575152, #625105, #591893, #621980 - needs fixing; two SRU merge proposals (lucid & maverick) for likewise, huge patches (958 & 1427 lines), fix 9 bugs, none of the bugs have SRU statements, will review again once those SRU statements are in place for each bug, advised that in the future, SRUs can go a little smoother LP: #677998 - fix looks good, ubuntu-dev doesn't have commit rights on the target branch, couldn't get the orig.tar.gz created, unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors for now, contacted ubuntu-doc, noted this in my review LP: #682153 - patch was simple/clean/good, built and tested, works and looks better here, sponsored and pushed - however, seb128 raised an issue with my sponsoring this bug in IRC, noting that I should have talked to the DX team first; my bad (I thought it was pretty straightforward); perhaps we need some notes in the PatchPilot wiki page on what to do about design issues? LP: #685860 - this one is hard/messy, proposed branch has conflicts, not ready for sponsoring, marked incomplete, unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors, subscribed myself, will take another look if someone can clean up the conflicts - author pinged me in IRC saying that there shouldn't be conflicts with his debdiff; I ran out of time today before having a chance to take a second look, sorry. Dustin Kirkland -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
