En Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:26:35 -0500, Martin Owens <docto...@gmail.com>
escribió:
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 04:22 -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
I think it's the height of arrogance for us to tell a user that we're
going to deliberately break his application because it wasn't updated
to
use our new indicator library.
We tell users all the time that we've broken their windows application
by not implementing any windows apis. No guarantees.
So, do we guarantee completely that gnome 2.x apps will function in
Unity? If we do, then we should support the entire API (somehow),
otherwise we be honest and say we support a major subset which may mean
your app won't work completely.
It can hardly be arrogance so long as we're honest about what we
support.
Martin Owens
--
Usando el novísimo cliente de correo de Opera: http://www.opera.com/mail/
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
