On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 16:04, Chase Douglas <chase.doug...@canonical.com> wrote: > True, but progress sometimes means change. I think this system would > work better, and if proven right it could be a model for other boards to > adopt. If it's worse, then the DMB can easily switch back. I would also > be happy to be a guinea pig for any process changes.
I echo Chase's opinion in this regard; we should remain flexible in adapting our approval processes. The only thing I add is that we should be cognizant of building a timeout into the process using Launchpad so that applications don't "spin indefinitely," e.g., "the stale five-digit Launchpad bug report." Cheers, -Dan -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
