On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 04:15:43PM -0800, Clint Byrum wrote: > I was just reviewing the SRU's that Chuck Short uploaded for keystone, > nova, and glance to oneiric-proposed, and it strikes me that really > OpenStack core components should go through the MicroReleaseException > process. > > Upstream has active QA, and as of diablo supports a stable release branch > with policies around acceptance. > > Just sending this to ubuntu-devel as a PSA that if your SRU has more > than 2 or 3 bugs to fix at one time, its probably not going to be able > to pass through our manual patch review process. However, take a look > at the criteria here and consider applying for a micro release exception: > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/MicroReleaseExceptions
Hi Clint, I think this really needs some further clarification. I followed this process earlier this year, when performing an SRU for bind9 which involved a new upstream version.. This was jumping from upstream versions 9.7.0 -> 9.7.3 in Lucid. I raised the subject with the TB, and mdz responded that: "MicroReleaseExceptions is a list of standing exceptions. It's not necessary to go through the tech board to handle one-off requests like this one. The SRU team can decide what to do here without TB involvement." [0] Is this still the case? [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/bind9/+bug/651875/comments/12 Kind Regards, Dave Walker
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
