On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Rick Spencer <rick.spen...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Jono Bacon <j...@ubuntu.com> >> >> The Kubuntu team are welcome to determine whatever milestones they >> want - no one is suggesting anything needs to change for the flavors >> in their testing cadence. I am purely stating how Nick will be >> working: the only output of this work is assured mandatory test case >> testing and this testing uncovering any bugs. As I said earlier, this >> work is independent of whether we remove milestones or not. > > I think the terminology here is the source of some confusion. I think > when you (Jono) say "milestones" people hear specifically the already > defined "alpha and beta" Milestones. I don't think you mean that. I > think you are using the term "milestones" differently, to just mean > "chosen dates for testing". > > I think it's fair to say that flavors can choose a higher frequency > for a testing cadence than just the alpha and beta dates,
Agreed: to be clear, when I say "milestones" I am referring to a "point in time when something happens", and in the context of this discussion testing I mean "the point in time when a testing run kicks off". Apologies for the confusion. Jono -- Jono Bacon Ubuntu Community Manager www.ubuntu.com / www.jonobacon.org www.identi.ca/jonobacon www.twitter.com/jonobacon -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
