Hi, Should we discuss the following topic in an UDS session?
Current situation ================= We have ubuntu-restricted-addons and ubuntu-restricted-extras in the archive. They depend on packages that are either non-free [1] or could be covered by patents (or both). ubuntu-restricted-addons pulls in: * flashplugin-installer (multiverse) * gstreamer0.10-fluendo-mp3 (universe) * gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg (universe) * gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad (universe) * gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly (universe) ubuntu-restricted-extras pulls in: * ubuntu-restricted-addons (multiverse) * gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad-multiverse (multiverse) * libavcodec-extra-53 (universe) * unrar (multiverse) * ttf-mscorefonts-installer (multiverse) Changes to discuss ================== * Should we rearrange the restricted packages: One to depend only on universe packages (patent restricted) and one only on multiverse (license restricted)? * Should we replace unrar by unar? Should we install unar by default? * Should we install the universe packages by default? Should the user have an opt-out chance at install time? [1] non-free = not comply with the DFSG -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel