On Thursday, July 11, 2013 10:31:03 AM Aigars Mahinovs wrote: > On 11 July 2013 08:43, Scott Kitterman <ubu...@kitterman.com> wrote: > > > It seems so strange to spend six months saying "don't touch that" just > > > to turn around and then spend nine months begging people to touch > > > that... > > > > I know it can be confusing, but the $devel-proposed (that should be future > > proof) serves a completely different purpose than -proposed post-release. > > > > Once > > > > Saucy is released, saucy-proposed will serve the same purpose -proposed > > has > > always served. "Not for humans" only applies to the development phase. > > It looks like the two different uses of -proposed should be separated, no? > So a $devel release would have an always empty $devel-proposed and all that > is currently pushed there would go to $devel-autobuilder-only-proposed or > something and a released verison would continue as-is.
In theory, sure. In practice, it would take a lot of work to do that for very minimal gain. Scott K -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel