On Friday, May 23, 2014 17:39:23 Didier Roche wrote: > Le 23/05/2014 17:37, Didier Roche a écrit : > > Le 23/05/2014 17:34, Scott Kitterman a écrit : > >> On Friday, May 23, 2014 17:27:12 Didier Roche wrote: > >>> Le 23/05/2014 16:35, Scott Kitterman a écrit : > >>>> The other thing I didn't know is that CI train uploads bypass the New > >>>> queue in Ubuntu. That made my comment irrelevant anyway. This is a > >>>> bug > >>>> that REALLY needs fixing. Since CI train packages are mostly Ubuntu > >>>> specific (Qt5 is somewhat unique in this regard), I'd suggest those > >>>> need > >>>> review in New much more than the 75% of our packages we get from > >>>> Debian > >>>> unmodified that have already been through New there. > >>> > >>> This is the case since we had daily release and it's a bug/feature in > >>> Launchpad itself. > >>> > >>> This has been discussed multiple times at UDS and vUDS. It's exactly > >>> the > >>> reason why that every packaging changes are halting publication (in > >>> daily release previously, and now, in CI Train) and someone with the > >>> proper rights (uploads rights or archive admins, depending on the > >>> process) are reviewing the packaging diff before pushing the > >>> publication > >>> button. > >> > >> Did an archive admin review the upload that kicked off this > >> discussion before > >> it was released to the archive? > > > > I guess Robru did that as part of the process (as he seems to be the > > one publishing it), Robert? > > My mistake, actually, checking the logs, it was Timo publishing it.
This is the fundamental problem. For normal uploads this kind of review is enforced. For CI train, it's a matter of someone remembering. Scott K -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
