On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 7:24 PM Seth Arnold <seth.arn...@canonical.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 03:54:11PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > > > Xen - xen unprivileged domains > > > > as cpaelzer mentioned, Xen should probably move up to the 'best > > effort' section; this was just moved out of main in focal. > > Xen's status before focal was awkward: the source package and libxen were > in main because libvirt depended upon them. However, the hypervisor and > related utilities were in universe and not supported. > > I'm not sure where exactly this Xen resource agent should be placed on > the list -- but in practice, Xen wasn't in main, and that may influence > your thinking.
From UA perspective looking back at support requests, there have been only a small handful of cases involving Xen hypervisor itself. There are quite a few cases where we fixed the Xen guest code in the kernel, but that's of course different. So while I would still recommend putting Xen into the 'best effort' section, in practice it's likely to make little to no difference for UA. > > Thanks -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel