Hi, Thank you for raising this!
I have half a draft that I was preparing to debian-devel@ to try and seek consensus there on this. Since we inherit most of our packaging from Debian, I thought I'd try there in the first instance, as otherwise whatever we do in Ubuntu may end up being "overridden" by Debian anyway. I'll post a link to this thread when I post that (it won't be this week). I'd also like to point out that, IMHO at least, this is far from urgent, as users can already override using the existing systemd override mechanisms that will cover their local customisations. This is a pattern already necessary, for example when users use paths not already permitted by shipped AppArmor rules. For this reason, I think we should hold on any SRUs until consensus is reached. Even when we conclude what general packaging pattern to use, I'm not sure that changing behaviour in SRUs makes sense, since we might regress users by creating timeouts when they are configured in particular ways. But let's see where the discussions lead. Robie
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel