On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 4:26 PM Steve Langasek <steve.langa...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > > The test has never passed; it has had neutral results and failing results, > > but by policy, proposed-migration does not treat neutral->fail as a > > migration-blocking regression, only pass->fail. Neutral test results are > > informational only. > > Having said this, I am just this moment looking at cases where britney is > treating neutral->fail as a regression. I still believe the intended policy > is as I described, but one way or another there appear to be some bugs here > in the implementation ;)
devhelp's autopkgtest is marked as "superficial". In Debian, a passing superficial autopkgtest won't speed up migration to Testing. But if the test fails, it indicates that there is a serious bug and migration to Testing is blocked. Please see the description of the intent of "superficial": https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/blob/master/doc/README.package-tests.rst Thank you, Jeremy Bicha -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel