Mark,
I'm tempted to start the migration to Kea, but the documentation is
extremely vague on proper migration. If we intend to move in that
direction, we'll need to have a migration guide of some sort, so that
it's a more seamless transition for people. Just a thought.
Thomas
On 5/16/22 14:40, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
On 16/05/2022 18:34, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
Could we perhaps start with phasing out the client, get its rdeps to
use alternatives, and then stop building it, and eventually get to the
server? This could be a lot of work, as I said, isc-dhcp is a classic,
but if upstream is shifting its focus elsewhere, soon we will be
alone.
Thanks for raising the topic. Upstream is clearly signalling their
preference for a Kea-only future, so one way or another folks who are
on ISC dhcpd are going to need to pick a new offering. I moved a
network to Kea last year because ISC dhcpd HA had a number of
unexpected behaviours, Kea seems much more rational in that regard and
a good fit for our own offerings and services such as MAAS. I also
think we might be able to contribute dqlite support for Kea upstream,
which would make HA even easier.
Mark
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
