Hi Seb, On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 09:44:30PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Hey there,
> I'm trying to see how we can fix https://launchpad.net/bugs/1931582 in > Ubuntu, which is about adding a LOGO=<logoname> entry to os-release. > I think it somewhat would make sense to provide the logos (plural because > following > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/merge_requests/985 it > makes sense to have -text/-dark/text-dark variants.) in the same package as > the key is defined? > Checking the current logo images it would be ~15kB of svg (or maybe png) > files added to the package. > Would that sound something reasonable? This seems ok in terms of the impact on the size of the base system (i.e. negligible), but I wonder about the interfaces here. Flavors have their own individual logos, which they use for plymouth/grub themes for example. If we add LOGO to /etc/os-release, do we have to worry about other upstreams picking this up and using it in other contexts where it's less appropriate, because we want flavors to be able to customize appearance independently of base-files? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
