Hi, Recently, I was made aware of the existence of the ubuntu-policy package [1], which contains the Ubuntu equivalent of the Debian Policy [2] (unlike the Debian version, I don't think the Ubuntu Policy is published anywhere on the web, i.e. it only exists in the linked package).
The Ubuntu Policy (which is derived from and largely identical to the Debian one) has not seen any updates since 2009. This has been pointed out in a bug [3] filed in 2011 already. Context: A PR that aims to update/improve some language about the Ubuntu Archive [4] in the Ubuntu Project docs led to a suggestion that the text in ubuntu-policy should be updated, too. Given the Ubuntu version of the policy has not been updated for so long, and the fact that the Debian version has moved on considerably in the meantime, I'm wondering whether ubuntu-policy is needed (or should exist) in its current form. The neglect would seem to imply that its existence and/or actual content is not relevant or needed for the Ubuntu project. Another possibility (a more likely one I'd venture) is that the Ubuntu parts of the Policy have not changed (much), i.e. are still relevant and authoritative. But no one felt strongly enough about the package to bring the Debian parts up to date with the Debian counterpart. Either way, I'd argue that the package as it is is not very useful. Bringing it up to date with Debian would be a pain (not just because of the content itself but also because Debian switched to a different build and publication system for the content in the meantime). I'd suggest choosing one of the following two options: * Removing the package and publishing relevant (i.e. Ubuntu-specific) parts of the content in the Ubuntu Project docs [5] (possibly gatekeeping any changes to the content similarly to the way we handled SRU, MIR, Board, and other 'sensitive' docs). * Or (if it was deemed useful to keep the package and have such 'offline' version) publishing the Ubuntu parts of the policy in the Ubuntu Project docs and sourcing the content for the ubuntu-policy package from there. This would put the authoritative content in the same place with other project docs and keep the package around, but eliminate the burden of keeping it up-to-date with the Debian Policy (well, no one has been shouldering that burden for the past 15+ years, but that's not a good reason to leave it rotting). What do you think? Robert [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-policy/ [2] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-policy/+bug/817264 [4] https://github.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-project-docs/pull/309 [5] https://documentation.ubuntu.com/project/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
