-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 James Westby wrote: > On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:19:32 +1100, Martin Pool <m...@canonical.com> wrote: >> My hypothesis is that we (Canonical's Bazaar team) will get to grips >> with UDD better if there is a tighter medium-term focus. >> >> The key question is whether vcs-imports is that thing, or not. >> >> If we do make imports that one important thing then I'll be asking >> people not to work on looms, UDD merge support, or nested trees until >> they're done. > > What would you consider "done." Do you think that with 4 months effort > you could get to 0 outstanding failures, or would there be some other > stop point? > > Thanks, > > James
I would guess that needs to be evaluated on the fly. If we are getting to the point of diminishing returns, then it is reasonable to re-evaluate what our priority should be. John =:-> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAksqohEACgkQJdeBCYSNAAMTdQCfU/gloeg//018F19heyvJeqQz 824AoNVQABCMCu9D3SGJBUyyo5xtQ85s =khW1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
