On 20 July 2011 10:12, Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Martin Pool <m...@canonical.com> wrote: > > It would be good to get that rmadison into lptools or ubuntu-dev-tools > > - even a moderately hacky state would be useful. > > > > In general any feature that might conceivably have bad consequences or > > not be what people want probably ought to be behind a configuration > > option, and I think this is in that class. > > > > Please file a bug against lp saying this api call is slow enough to be > > a problem. > > FWIW: > - If its responding within 1 second consistently its within our > current performance goal > - if its (ever) slower than 9 seconds it will timeout and fixing it > to be <9 will be a critical bug > - if you want it faster outside these parameters, the best thing to > do is to use the stakeholders escalation process, or submit patches.
Right. It is obviously not timing out. If we have a bug, we can decide whether it's slow enough to be a problem, and potentially send a patch, or on the other hand decide that it's not a priority. Filing bugs that never get fixed is a kind of waste, but if people are repeatedly talking about an issue I think it's better to get a bug number and a specific decision than to have it just nebulous. > > I doubt API calls are being cached (even anonymously) but perhaps they are. > > Nothing with an auth header gets cached. Right, but lp_api_lite doesn't send auth headers. (Possibly we need to revisit that in the case we ever have private derived distros.) m -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
