On 4/27/2010 3:26 PM, Oliver Heinz wrote: > Am Dienstag, 27. April 2010 13:01:36 schrieb Ante Karamatić: >> On 27.04.2010 12:58, Oliver Heinz wrote: >>> I use bonding, vlans and bridge interfaces. No dhcp just fixed adresses. >> >> Other two people with this issue also use bonding and after disabling >> bonding issue was gone. Could you please verify this? > > bonding disabled, vlan enabled and bridge enabled -> segfaults on both nodes > bonding disabled, vlan enabled and bridge disabled -> segfaults on both nodes > bonding disabled, vlan disabled and bridge enabled -> segfaults on both nodes > > bonding enabled, vlan enabled and bridge enabled -> segfaults on both nodes > bonding enabled, vlan enabled and bridge disabled -> segfaults on both nodes > bonding enabled, vlan disabled and bridge disabled -> segfaults on both nodes > > bonding disabled, vlan disabled and bridge disabled (aka plain interface)-> > works :-) > > bad news is: it's not only bonding related > good news is: vlan and bridging are easier to simulate in a VM I guess >
Please collect all those information and file a bug on bugzilla.redhat.com component pacemaker in fedora/rawhide. Cheers Fabio _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ha Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ha More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
