Hello.  I have been working with the Debian maintainers (particularly
ocfs2-tools) to get their packages in shape for supporting
Pacemaker/corosync/openais.

I now have a complete, working Pacemaker stack with OCFS2 running on a
Lucid cluster using nothing but Debian experimental packages
(including redhat-cluster, ocfs2-tools, and the new
ocfs2-tools-pacemaker package).

The Debian folks have been very responsive, fixing all of my reported
bugs; e.g., adding the udev "51-ocfs2.rules" file, eliminating the
dependency on libdlm-dev, etc.:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=ocfs2-tools

In my opinion, ubuntu-ha should import these upstream versions as soon
as possible.  Unnecessary forks are... well, unnecessary.  Also the
Debian experimental ocfs2-tools is up to version 1.4.4, as opposed to
the ubuntu-ha PPA at 1.4.3.

As an aside, I am also working with the OCFS2 developers to lift the
16 TiB single-volume restriction:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/29/393

Because I need it.  I would love for my patch to get accepted into
mainline and then somehow to make it into Maverick...  But I guess it
is probably too late for that (?).

Anyway, just wanted to say "hello" and give you folks a nudge towards
re-syncing with Debian, if you do not mind.

Cheers!

 - Pat

P.S.  I have applied for membership to the ubuntu-ha group.  Is there
anything in particular I should be doing if I want to join?

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ha
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ha
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to